Leaderboard

The games aren't compensated. The RTP is worked out before any real money spins are taken, and calculated from the maths inherent to the game. If I had a bag with 100 balls in, and only 1 was red, the chances of me picking out the red ball is 1 in 100. It doesn't matter how many times people have picked balls out of the bag before me, the odds are always 1 in 100 (as long as the balls are replaced after every go). As such, every single spin is like plunging your hand into a giant bag of balls. But we are talking about millions of balls here, or even billions of balls. We can know what the chances are of you picking any ball out, and as such we can know from this the RTP. Everyone is simultaneously picking a random ball from the same bag, every spin. And it's the same bag every time with the same set of balls. It doesn't matter if I win, the chances of me getting that Helios Fury on my very next buy are exactly the same as what they were with the first buy. Its provably fair, both mathematically and statistically; and what has happened in the past or may happen in the future will have no real world bearing upon your result.

A lot of gamblers interpret RTP wrong. It has nothing to do with your account balance or deposits and everything to do with the money staked/bet/played. Example for demonstration purpose - imagine a game with exactly 95% RTP all of the time. £100 starting balance = £100 You do 100 spins at £1 total staked in those 100 spins = £100 Total returned = £95 casino has won £5 which is 5% of £100 Your balance is now £95 You another 100 spins at £1 total staked in the 200 spins = £200 Your balance is now £90 Casino has won £10 which is 5% of £200 It is the churn. It is why roulette in a live casino has 97.3%(2.7% house advantage)RTP but a casino will expect the hold percentage (the percentage of the actual buyins/deposits that the casino will win) to be between 14% - 17% people continue playing, you might have only bought in for £100 but you stake much more then that. Stake £100 get back £97.30(on average/large sample size etcetc) then you stake that £97.30 and get back £94.67, stake that £94.67 and get back £92.15, stake that £92.15 and get back £89.63, stale that £89.63 and get back 87.21……. Continue until you have £0 The casino can still say, and quite rightly and truthfully so, that they paid out 97.3%. They paid out 97.3% of the money staked but to the player it will seem like they lost 100% of their money.

Hey Will / Chloe , good luck to everyone taking part , here's my entry Eric Nolan , Dublin , 296x win on a bonus at 20c stake. Played at Ladbrokes.

so the bigger the pockets the bigger the chance then ?

There are a lot of balls mate. Also, whilst this is a perfectly valid mathematical explanation, it is simplified. There might be one ball in there that has a value of 100x, but that could be an average value - with a distribution that ranged from 0 to 50,000. So you could think that when you picked out that ball you then got to pick another ball from another bag, and so on - through dimensions. For very complicated games, or games with features such as "unlimited multipliers" things really can be unlimited - however the odds can always be calculated back to the original spin cost. You only have to look at how many dead spins you get to realise quite how many balls there are. Most of the balls are duds. Its fascinating, but I'm very aware that most of us have very few truly random interactions day to day. The world imposes order on us, and as such we search for it in everything we encounter. Where slots are concerned - it's all random and it's all luck 😊

Wow 😳 Very nice on a 20p stake

That’s huge - congrats! Hope you spend it on something nice 🙂

Perhaps for balding, middle aged men that like slots!! I do however have all my door handles in place! I missed the live as my selfish children took my attention but the dedicated video was class!! Chloe is a lucky lady 🤣🤣 with love!

Held the balance for ages, bonused frequently but in the end took the balance. d